The capture of the vessel Tryal has always been accredited to Paulsgrave Williams. Even though this deposition doesn't specifically name him, it does include a bit of a description of his ship and of the man himself. For that [art alone this deposition stands out as there are almost never physical descriptions of the pirates in these depositions!
I left in most of the original spelling from the deposition for authenticity.
"Deposition of John Lucas, Master of the Ship Tryal of
Brighthelmstone of Great Britain before John Hart, Governor of Maryland".
Annapolis. April 13, 1717. Colonial Office Papers 5/1318 no.16iii.
John Hart Esqr., Captain Generall, Governor & Vice
Admiral of the Province of Maryland etc. To all to whom these presents shall
come,
Greeting,
Know ye that on
the thirteenth day of Aprill Anno Domini Seventeen Hundred and seventeen came
before me John Lucas Master of the Ship Tryal of Brighthelmstone of Great
Britain, and deposed on ye Holy Evangelist of Almighty God that on Tuesday the
ninth Instant about six of ye clock in the morning he being with his sd. ship
& compy consisting of seven men & two boys about three Leagues to ye
East South East of Cape Henry as he was standing into ye Capes of Virginia, he
saw a Sloop lying under the Land, which _____ bore down to him, and commanded
their boat on board them, Acquainting him at the same time that they were
Pyrates, and threatning that if he not immediately comply they would sink his
Ship. Whereupon he the sd. Capt. John Lucas went with his boat & four hands
on board the sd. Pyrate's vessell where he and his men that went with him, were
forcibly & against their wills detained from seven of the clock in the
morning, until three in the afternoon, when & not before he the sd. John
Lucas was permitted to go with his boat & men on board his said ship. That
severall of the Pyrate's crew went on board his Ship and remained on board her
till about Six of the Clock in ye afternoon And then as he supposes the Pyrates
Spying a Ship coming out of the Capes and being afraid, stood off with their
Sloop to Sea, Commanding him the sd. John Lucas with his Ship and Saylors to
follow after them, upon the ______ of his and his Saylors lives. But the sd.
John Lucas finding the wind spring up did not obey them but ran into the Capes
and so got away from them with his said Ship & Company.
The sd. John
Lucas further deposed that as soon as he came on board his ship, he was told by
his Mate and Sailors, that the Pyrates had been aboard her, whilst he was
detained on board their Sloop near nine hours & had rumaged her hold, and
had taken from on board her three Boat's Lading of goods, and thrown severall
things overboard _____ as boxes, trunks & a Chest of Drawers etc. Besides
which he does not know of any other damage done to the sd. Ship's Lading, and
that he himself nor any other Person whatsoever by his knowledge or
procurement, directly or indirectly hath not done, committed or suffered any
Wast or Imbezelment of any part of the sd. ship's Cargo. And the sd. John Lucas
Further deposed that the sd. Pyrate's Vessell was a Sloop seemingly of New
England built, about the burthen of fourty or fifty tuns her Quarter being spotted with blew and yellow, as
likewise her stern spotted with blew, and having no windows, That her Mast was
sprung at the head and near the deck and that She had old patcht sails, That
they had a St. _______ Jack hoisted at the Boltspritt and that the sd. Sloop
had twelve guns, Six on carriages, four in Swivells and two more in the hold,
and seem'd to be mann'd ______ about fourty men, most of which seemed to be
English, & Especially the Pyrate's Captain, who was a middlesized man of a
dark brown complexion wearing a peruke That he the sd. John Lucas observed
there were Five Frenchmen, five Negros & an Indian on board the sd.
Pirate's sloop.
These are details about one of those ships who Charles Johnson (ahem.. Nathaniel Mist) gave credit to Stede Bonnet.. But, the depositions of Andrew Turbett & Robert Gilmore give it not to Paulsgrave Williams, but his buddy Samuel Bellamy! That very same record (CO 5/1318) gave three lines devoted to Samuel Bellamy and his family in Devon. Somehow, Johnson-Mist "misread" it and gave it to Stede Bonnett.. also, he "misread" the date and said it was August and not April, 1717. Amazing how faulty Johnson-Mist's eyes must have been! Huh? I think he was just a liar.. and it's good that we're getting all these details straight... after only 300 years!
ReplyDelete